+1 for the custom component
2013/4/22 Christian Kaltepoth <[email protected]> > I like the idea of a custom component because it makes it more explicit > what the component is used for and perhaps would even provide more control > over what is happening. > > So +1 for a custom component > > > 2013/4/21 Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > > > Gerhard brought up another alternative: simply provide a component which > > doesn't render any html but adds the windowhandler.js and stores the > > component in the ViewRoot. > > > > LieGrue, > > strub > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > > > To: Mark Struberg <[email protected]>; > > [email protected] > > > Cc: > > > Sent: Sunday, 21 April 2013, 20:56 > > > Subject: Re: windowId postback detection > > > > > > 1 sounds easier to track too > > > Le 21 avr. 2013 18:09, "Mark Struberg" <[email protected]> a > > > écrit : > > > > > >> Hi! > > >> > > >> There are technically 2 options for extracting the windowId on POSTs: > > >> > > >> 1.) setting a hidden UIOutput component in the ViewRoot > > >> > > >> > > >> 2.) provide a custom renderkit/ResponseStateManager > > >> > > >> I think 1.) is much easier. Any input? > > >> > > >> LIeGrue, > > >> strub > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > Christian Kaltepoth > Blog: http://blog.kaltepoth.de/ > Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal > GitHub: https://github.com/chkal >
