Basically string fixes doesnt need it but then the fixes sound doable to
get a release in 1-2 months no?
Le 22 mars 2013 21:24, "Gerhard Petracek" <[email protected]> a
écrit :

> as i said in the other thread, some use-cases are blocked by [1] and we
> have to finish [2].
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-289
> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-113
>
>
>
> 2013/3/22 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>
>
> > Ok makes sense then
> >
> > So next question:
> > When do we get next release (starts to last)? Cdi query and typed
> > navigation.seems the features to get it
> >
> > Wdyt?
> > Le 22 mars 2013 21:12, "Gerhard Petracek" <[email protected]> a
> > écrit :
> >
> > > hi romain,
> > >
> > > it works with codi, but the implementation in deltaspike isn't
> finished.
> > > it isn't the only use-case which is missing right now.
> > > (as you see the ticket is in progress and not resolved.)
> > >
> > > regards,
> > > gerhard
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 2013/3/22 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>
> > >
> > > > forgot to say the same for pages ;)
> > > >
> > > > *Romain Manni-Bucau*
> > > > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
> > > > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
> > > > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
> > > > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
> > > > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2013/3/22 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>
> > > >
> > > > > Hi
> > > > >
> > > > > why (is there any reason) don't we  handle: @View(basePath =
> "foo") ?
> > > > >
> > > > > doing like JAXRS we could just convert it do /foo (since / is
> > > mandatory)
> > > > >
> > > > > *Romain Manni-Bucau*
> > > > > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
> > > > > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
> > > > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
> > > > > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
> > > > > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to