+1 !! On Mar 12, 2013, at 9:06 PM, Arne Limburg <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 for repository, from me too > > Gesendet mit meinem HTC > > > ----- Reply message ----- > Von: "Thomas Andraschko" <[email protected]> > An: "[email protected]" > <[email protected]> > Betreff: cdi-query, no news? > Datum: Di., Mär. 12, 2013 20:38 > > > > +1 repository! :) "Query" doesn't really match the functionaly. > > 2013/3/12 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > >> +2 for repo >> >> btw did you fixed the scope issue? >> >> *Romain Manni-Bucau* >> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* >> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> >> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* >> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* >> >> >> >> 2013/3/12 Thomas Hug <[email protected]> >> >>> The name is still freely choosable - data sounds fine to me if nobody >> minds >>> the obvious mirroring on Spring Data ;) dao/@Dao is discussable, all the >>> domain driven folks prefer probably something like "Repository". >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 7:29 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau >>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Great :) >>>> >>>> any issue changing "query" to something closer to what it really does ; >>>> "dao" (because of @Dao) or "data"? >>>> >>>> *Romain Manni-Bucau* >>>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* >>>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< >>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> >>>> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* >>>> *Github: https://gihub.com/rmannibucau* < >> https://github.com/rmannibucau* >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 2013/3/12 Thomas Hug <[email protected]> >>>> >>>>> FYI, I've started something like an import proposal in a dedicated >>> branch >>>>> [1]. There's currently only the JBoss Arquillian profile running, >>> haven't >>>>> looked at the others. Any support there and of course other input's >>> very >>>>> welcome :) >>>>> >>>>> [1] https://github.com/ctpconsulting/query/tree/dsimport >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 7:45 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau < >>>> [email protected] >>>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Yes >>>>>> >>>>>> It works fine but you bring too much spring dependencies (totally >>>> useless >>>>>> when used this way) which clearly show it is rather a bridge than a >>>>>> solution + there were some leaks in previous version (didnt check >> fix >>>> was >>>>>> released to be honest) because if this usage which was not the >>> default >>>>> one. >>>>>> >>>>>> Since cdi query is here it worths importing it IMO >>>>>> Le 5 mars 2013 02:21, "hantsy" <[email protected]> a écrit : >>>>>> >>>>>>> I remember the Spring Data has a CDI extension, but I have not >> used >>>> it >>>>>>> in projects. Is there anyone used it in Java EE 6 projects? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hantsy >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 3/3/2013 20:40, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >>>>>>>> Basically if the query logic could be scope agnostic it would >> be >>>>>> perfect >>>>>>>> for me. Parameters were fine and matched the coomon need. I m >> not >>>>> sure >>>>>> i >>>>>>>> get what is blocking. Can you detail it a bit please? >>>>>>>> Le 3 mars 2013 13:09, "Thomas Hug" < >>> [email protected]> >>>> a >>>>>>> écrit : >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Aha got you. Yes QueryHandler can be moved to application >> scope. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The other request scoped component ist the >>>>> CdiQueryInvocationContext. >>>>>>> Here >>>>>>>>> we store a bunch of data which is related to the current query >>>>>>> (parameters, >>>>>>>>> query string etc). Originally this was passed as parameter, >> but >>>> got >>>>>>>>> injectable for the extension mechanism [1]. Currently on >>> holidays >>>>>> (sorry >>>>>>>>> the response delays) so not much time to look into it but >> happy >>> to >>>>>> take >>>>>>>>> suggestions :) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [1] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> http://ctpconsulting.github.com/query/1.0.0.Alpha5/extensions.html#extension-delegates >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 8:18 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau < >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Hmm, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Wonder if the scope couldnt be application one. Request >> sounds >>>> too >>>>>> much >>>>>>>>> web >>>>>>>>>> to be usable/generic >>>>>>>>>> Le 1 mars 2013 19:02, "Thomas Hug" < >>>> [email protected]> >>>>> a >>>>>>>>>> écrit : >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Fine for me - planned to create a branch with all the >>>> experimental >>>>>>> APIs >>>>>>>>>>> cleared out as an import proposal. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> RE scope, the InvocationHandlers are validated to be normal >>>> scoped >>>>>>> [1], >>>>>>>>>> so >>>>>>>>>>> that seemed to me the most appropriate choice - any other >>>>>> suggestions? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> [1] >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> https://github.com/DeltaSpike/Mirror/blob/master/deltaspike/core/impl/src/main/java/org/apache/deltaspike/core/impl/invocationhandler/InvocationHandlerBindingExtension.java#L198 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> some news of it? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> i think it is time to import at least a first version, >> isn't >>>> it? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Just a note on current code, i saw QueryHandler (and some >>> other >>>>>>>>> beans) >>>>>>>>>>> has >>>>>>>>>>>> a request scope. Wonder if such a scope means something >> for a >>>>>> generic >>>>>>>>>>> (not >>>>>>>>>>>> web) lib. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> wdyt? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> *Romain Manni-Bucau* >>>>>>>>>>>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* >>>>>>>>>>>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< >>>>>>>>>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> >>>>>>>>>>>> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* >>>>>>>>>>>> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> 2013/2/20 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> guy you rocks! >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> effectively i missed it when i looked. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> *Romain Manni-Bucau* >>>>>>>>>>>>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* >>>>>>>>>>>>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< >>>>>>>>>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> >>>>>>>>>>>>> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* >>>>>>>>>>>>> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2013/2/20 Thomas Hug <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thnx Romain. If with proxy stuff you refer to the DS >>>>>>>>>>>>>> InvocationHandlerBinding, that's already integrated :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> RE pagination, it's maybe not that obvious, but there's >>> more >>>>>>>>>> advanced >>>>>>>>>>>>>> support in QueryResult [1][2], which is more of a fluent >>> API >>>>>>>>>> approach, >>>>>>>>>>>> but >>>>>>>>>>>>>> should behave similar to a PageRequest (the query >> execution >>>> is >>>>>>>>>> delayed >>>>>>>>>>>>>> until the getResult() methods on QueryResult is called). >>> Hope >>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>> fits >>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> what you had in mind. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> https://github.com/ctpconsulting/query/blob/deltaspike/api/src/main/java/com/ctp/cdi/query/QueryResult.java >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> https://github.com/ctpconsulting/query/blob/deltaspike/impl/src/test/java/com/ctp/cdi/query/QueryResultTest.java >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 10:04 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Thomas, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> importing proxy stuff would be the first great stuff. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> i'd like to see some pagination API (like PageRequest >> etc >>> in >>>>>>>>>> spring >>>>>>>>>>>>>> world) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which are more user friendly that @FirstResult and >>>>> @MaxResult). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wdyt? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Romain Manni-Bucau* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau >>> * >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2013/2/20 Thomas Hug <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CDI Query has now a completely Solder-free POM. Feel >> free >>>> to >>>>>>>>>> drop >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comments >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on the API - some parts might actually be fully >> excluded >>>>> (e.g. >>>>>>>>>>> home >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> critera APIs). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Mark Struberg < >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Thomas, great news! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LieGrue, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strub >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Thomas Hug <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: "[email protected]" < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 4:10 PM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: cdi-query, no news? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FYI, I've started to "de-solderize" CDI Query and >> move >>>>>>>>> things >>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> depend >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DS Core [1]: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> https://github.com/ctpconsulting/query/tree/deltaspike >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Todos: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [x] Replace ServiceHandler >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [_] Include Property utils >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [_] Replace JBoss Logging >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any feedback welcome. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] including this modification >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-113?focusedCommentId=13576531&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13576531 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a review of the API i guess >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what is missing today is probably the pagination >>> helpers >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (PageRequest >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instance) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but technically all is fine IMO >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Romain Manni-Bucau* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau < >>> https://twitter.com/rmannibucau >>>>>>>>>> * >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2013/2/11 Jason Porter <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know I'm playing the necromancer, but please >>> forgive >>>>>>>>>> me. >>>>>>>>>>> We >>>>>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> InvocationHandler, which looks like it would work >> as >>> a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ServiceHandler >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> substitute. What else is needed to get CDI Query >> into >>>>>>>>>>>>>> DeltaSpike? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Romain >> Manni-Bucau >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1, it is a must have for cdi world >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 18 nov. 2012 20:04, "john.d.ament" < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> écrit : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RE ServiceHandler - I was one of those who >>>>>>>>> previously >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggested >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bringing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> over to DeltaSpike, you can see DELTASPIKE-113 >> and >>>>>>>>>> find >>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thread >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from April of this year. At the time, I was in a >>>>>>>>>>>> position >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> where I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> couldn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> spend much time on open source contribution. >> I've >>>>>>>>>>>> recently >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jobs, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something that's going to help me spend some more >>>>>>>>>> time >>>>>>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> open >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> source >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> community, and believe I can pick it back up if >>>>>>>>> we're >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ready. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If everyone's ok with it I can start a new thread >>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>> 113 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> revive >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> old >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thread (though it may come through with a large >>>>>>>>> pile >>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> dust). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> John >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> View this message in context: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> http://apache-deltaspike-incubator-discussions.2316169.n4.nabble.com/cdi-query-no-news-tp4654029p4654036.html >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from the Apache DeltaSpike Incubator >>>>>>>>> Discussions >>>>>>>>>>>>>> mailing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> list >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> archive >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at Nabble.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jason Porter >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://en.gravatar.com/lightguardjp >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>
