IMO cdi-query is more important than any integration with a third party
(spring, osgi..)

Wdyt?
Le 6 juil. 2012 21:21, "Marius Bogoevici" <[email protected]> a
écrit :

> All,
>
> I know that it is a final the final stretch for 0.3 so all the energy is
> flowing in that direction, however, as a 0.4 release is brewing, I think it
> is a good moment to discuss whether a Spring bridge should be included in
> the 0.4 release. I believe that such a module should be included now, based
> on the fact that Java EE 6 is gaining momentum, and a number of developers
> I recently encountered have asked about ways to reuse their existing Spring
> codebase with the newly available features in Java EE 6. It is possible to
> direct people to Seam Spring and such, however it is clear from the start
> that those libraries will need to be replaced soon.
>
> So, I'd like to start a more in-depth discussion about features and
> design. An early glimpse is on the wiki page https://cwiki.apache.org/**
> DeltaSpike/spring-cdi-**integration.html<https://cwiki.apache.org/DeltaSpike/spring-cdi-integration.html>,
> but that is mostly providing a frame of refernence.
>
> I plan to start the discussion over the weekend, or as early as possible
> next week, but IMO for it to make sense the first step is clarifying that
> such a module could potentially be included on the 0.4 roadmap (knowing
> that the roadmap for 0.4 is yet to be defined). As I said, from my point of
> view this is a critically important item, and can be addressed now, given
> how the general-purpose facilities of DeltaSpike are in place.
>
> WDYT?
>
> Cheers,
> Marius
>

Reply via email to