Hi Antoine!

DS is imo clearly not only targeting JSF!

And I wasn't saying that a Converter framework wont be fine.

BUT: writing this _properly_ is a pretty complex task, and it has barely to do 
with DeltaSpike as it is not CDI depending. In fact, if I would do such a 
thing, I'd keep all the Converter logic purely native Java and additionally 
provide bindings to CDI and Spring.


I think there is already some Converter work done in Apache commons btw. - a 
converter framework in commons which can be used universally is the way to go 
imo.

LieGrue,
strub



----- Original Message -----
> From: Antoine Sabot-Durand <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: 
> Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2012 8:02 AM
> Subject: About Converter framework vote
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I'll probably vote +1 but wanted to comment this point 
> 
>>  a.) What is this for? -> no one knows
> 
> As I was away for a long time (Launching Agorava) I won't comment this
> 
>>  b.) Do we need it in DeltaSpike? -> not yet.
> 
> Yes you're probably right : we have more important things to deal with now
> 
>>  c.) Do we need it for JSF? -> No, JSF has it's own Converter logic
> 
> Yes, but JSF is not the only use case for using  CDI
> 
>>  d.) Do we need it somewhere else? -> No, not afaik
> 
> That's the point I don't agree with. I'm working on Java EE 6 POCS 
> for a customer. One go this POC is a full rest application using HTML5 techs 
> on 
> client and Jax-RS / CDI  and other Java EE tech on the server. It's obvious 
> that a converter framework would be very useful here since we won't have JSF 
> to deal with it. We'll have to create some batch POC, again converter would 
> be nice.
> 
> In fact it questions the goals of DS. We all agree on the fact that DS should 
> provide a way to ease CDI extension development. But beyond that should it 
> provide only tools ease to JSF development or should it be more ambitious by 
> bringing missing features for the whole Java EE 6 stack. You probably guessed 
> that I prefer the second solution ;-).
> 
> Antoine Sabot-Durand
> -------------------------------
> http://agorava.org
> @antoine_sd
>

Reply via email to