This is simply a stop gap until all the issues with the software grant are worked out. Richard has the files from Solder for the grant. Since I don't think it's been finalized should we now also include Security? I wonder if that will be tricky as Security is so tightly coupled with PicketLink.
Sent from my iPhone On Feb 22, 2012, at 9:09, Matt Benson <[email protected]> wrote: > Wait, I don't think is where we landed! :) Per Sam "under the terms > of the ALv2" is *not* the kind of license/grant we want, and he is > happy to let deltaspike go on committing things for which everyone > *expects* the appropriate SG will be eventually filed. > > Matt > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:27 AM, Gerhard Petracek > <[email protected]> wrote: >> hi @ all, >> >> i had to revert 1177d4a7fd3e669eb84ce3987368d5ceaebfeb6a because shane >> didn't add >> "Submitted on behalf of a third-part: Red Hat, Inc. under the terms of the >> ALv2" >> to the commit message of the initial import. >> >> furthermore there were >> - no license headers >> - 81 checkstyle issues >> i fixed those issues and pushed them to [1] - so you don't have to do it >> again. >> >> @shane: >> please import the files again and don't forget the hint in the commit >> message. >> >> @all: >> please always run >> mvn clean install >> before a push. >> >> regards, >> gerhard >> >> [1] https://github.com/os890/DS_Discuss/tree/DS69fixed
