On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 07:45, Christophe Lyon wrote: > > On Wed, 13 May 2020 at 19:44, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc <g...@gcc.gnu.org> > wrote: > > > > On Wed, 13 May 2020 at 18:19, Mike Stump via Gcc <g...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > > > > > I've changed the subject to match the 2015, 2017 and 2018 email threads. > > > > > > On May 13, 2020, at 3:26 AM, Thomas Schwinge <tho...@codesourcery.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Comparing DejaGnu/GCC testsuite '*.sum' files between two systems ("old" > > > > vs. "new") that ought to return identical results, I found that they > > > > didn't: > > > > > > > I have not found any evidence in DejaGnu master branch that this not > > > > working would've been a "recent" DejaGnu regression (and then fixed for > > > > DejaGnu 1.6) -- so do we have to assume that this never worked as > > > > intended back then? > > > > > > Likely not. > > > > > > > Per our "Prerequisites for GCC" installation documentation, we currently > > > > require DejaGnu 1.4.4. Advancing that to 1.6 is probably out of > > > > question, given that it has "just" been released (four years ago). > > > > > > :-) A user that wants full coverage should use 1.6, apparently. > > > > As documented at > > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/test.html#test.run.permutations > > anything older than 1.5.3 causes problems for libstdc++ (and probably > > the rest of GCC) because the options in --target_board get placed > > after the options in dg-options. If the test depends on the options in > > dg-options to work properly it might fail. For example, a test that > > has { dg-options "-O2" } and fails without optimisation would FAIL if > > you use --target_board=unix/-O0 with dejagnu 1.5. > > > I think that was commit: > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=dejagnu.git;a=commitdiff;h=5256bd82343000c76bc0e48139003f90b6184347 > which for sure was a major change (though I don't see it documented in > dejagnu/NEWS file)
Yes, that's the one.