Hi Jacob Some comments for your consideration --
On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 11:40:32PM -0600, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
> This patch is the long-promised dejagnu-report-card(1) tool,
> although it is not yet actually installed under that name, instead
> being run as "dejagnu report card" or "dejagnu report-card".
The former ("dejagnu report card") is confusing because "card" looks
like an argument. I think the launcher subcommands should not contain
spaces. dejagnu report-card seems natural enough to me.
> All three implementations are included in this patch. Installing it
> as dejagnu-report-card simply requires making a symlink
> dejagnu-report-card -> dejagnu; the launcher will handle the rest if
> called via such a symlink.
As the person who gets to maintain this code, I'm really not a fan of
multiple implementations. I don't mind if it's sh, Tcl or AWK. I
understand the intrinsic value of n-version development in testing,
but in practice, I don't want multiple copies of the code that do the
same thing. Please just pick one on the criteria of performance or
maintainability and submit that, please.
Thanks,
Ben
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ DejaGnu mailing list DejaGnu@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dejagnu
