On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 06:19:39PM -0600, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote: > The recent and ongoing discussion over is_remote (and why is that > the only is* predicate with an underscore in the name?) and its > less-than-entirely-accurate implementation started me thinking about > the topic. What would be a better way to handle remote testing?
I wondered about that, too. I will add an isremote proc that wraps is_remote. We can then try and depreciate is_remote over the long-term. Cheers, Ben
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ DejaGnu mailing list DejaGnu@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dejagnu
