Okay, a regression hunt of dejagnu master git revealed that this regression is actually quite old and that the offending commit was...
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/dejagnu.git/commit/?id=6d2e2d3791bcea70131a6cf64a0a5223333a7b8e 2011-03-14 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratoch...@redhat.com> * runtest.exp (runtest): Call reset_vars at initialisation so that a perror does not affect test results in other test scripts. This issue was latent in 1.5.1 because the 1.5 branch was reused for developing 1.5.1 whereas 1.5.2 was created from master instead. I can confirm that reverting this change in 1.5.2 eliminates the problem and I get the expected... === obj-c++ Summary for unix/-m32 === # of expected passes 3069 # of unexpected failures 39 # of expected failures 2 # of unresolved testcases 57 # of unsupported tests 68 === obj-c++ Summary for unix/-m64 === # of expected passes 3002 # of unexpected failures 45 # of expected failures 18 # of unresolved testcases 60 # of unsupported tests 74 === obj-c++ Summary === # of expected passes 6071 # of unexpected failures 84 # of expected failures 20 # of unresolved testcases 117 # of unsupported tests 142 On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth.mailing.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > Just to clarify. I am looking at > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/dejagnu.git which shows branches for > dejagnu-1.5 which behaves like 1.5.1 is I do a hard reset to the > 2013-03-08 commit which marked the ChangeLog to 1.5.1. The trouble is > that there is no matching dejagnu-1.5.1 branch but only a > dejagnu-1.5.2 branch. The 1.5.2 branch is problematic as I can't seem > to find a commit in that branch that behaves like 1.5.1. One would > think at going back to.. > > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/dejagnu.git/commit/?h=dejagnu-1.5.2&id=33b71e46c0a27fee374a922eb0792b9c618c54a8 > > would be just like 1.5.1 but it doesn't. Any idea when the 1.5.2 > branch was created? > > On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Jack Howarth > <howarth.mailing.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I am having problems trying to regression hunt this issue in dejagnu >> git. Using the gcc test suite run... >> >> make -k check-obj-c++ RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix'{-m32,-m64}'" >> >> I get... >> >> dejagnu 1.5.1 >> >> >> === obj-c++ Summary for unix/-m32 === >> >> # of expected passes 3069 >> # of unexpected failures 39 >> # of expected failures 2 >> # of unresolved testcases 57 >> # of unsupported tests 68 >> >> === obj-c++ Summary for unix/-m64 === >> >> # of expected passes 3002 >> # of unexpected failures 45 >> # of expected failures 18 >> # of unresolved testcases 60 >> # of unsupported tests 74 >> >> === obj-c++ Summary === >> >> # of expected passes 6071 >> # of unexpected failures 84 >> # of expected failures 20 >> # of unresolved testcases 117 >> # of unsupported tests 142 >> >> but... >> >> dejagnu 1.5.2 >> >> === obj-c++ Summary for unix/-m32 === >> >> # of expected passes 128 >> >> === obj-c++ Summary for unix/-m64 === >> >> # of expected passes 128 >> >> === obj-c++ Summary === >> >> # of expected passes 6071 >> # of unexpected failures 84 >> # of expected failures 20 >> # of unresolved testcases 117 >> # of unsupported tests 142 >> >> I can reproduce the dejagnu 1.5.1 results with a build using... >> >> git clone git://git.sv.gnu.org/dejagnu.git >> cd dejagnu >> git reset --hard 6bd8dddc81d8a5f2e835f148a9be1509f3edb147 >> >> >> which is the parent commit for >> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/dejagnu.git/commit/?id=52dad3fd75c64d8e8cc0de5f8ca123c4aa7c32d2 >> >> however if try the same for the first commit in the gcc-1.5.2 branch... >> >> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/dejagnu.git/commit/?h=dejagnu-1.5.2&id=d8912f7d0567831f425115eaeb6ee915e8ea5b21 >> >> using... >> >> git reset --hard 33b71e46c0a27fee374a922eb0792b9c618c54a8 >> >> the build acts like 1.5.2 even though it should only have one >> additional commit compared to the 1.5.1 release. Any clarifications on >> how these git trees are arranged would be appreciated. So far I am >> having no luck walking back in trunk to a point where the 1.5.1 >> behavior can be reproduced. >> Jack _______________________________________________ DejaGnu mailing list DejaGnu@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dejagnu
