On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 16:05 -0600, Joel Sherrill wrote: > Hi, > > Janis wanted a recap on this list. The thread > starts here: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2008-04/msg00587.html > > And this is the last message in the thread which > sums up the expert views: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2008-04/msg00708.html > > The latest powerpc-rtems4.10 GCC test results > are here: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-12/msg01477.html > > The tests in question are "scan-assembler" and > other tests which specify a particular -mcpu option > which conflicts with those used by the particular > target hardware we are running on. > > So for example, a test may try to verify that > gcc generates a particular instruction on a > ppc405. But the specific board cflags > are explicitly selecting another -mcpu so the > code can actually work on the target board.
I'll take another look at this. It probably needs to be solved within the GCC testsuite support rather than in DejaGnu. Janis _______________________________________________ DejaGnu mailing list DejaGnu@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dejagnu
