Executive summary: native, sim and board tests say it's fine; at least no worse than dejagnu-1.4.4; somewhat better. Ship it! ;)
A "git show" says the my latest update is, and verified with <http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=dejagnu.git;a=shortlog;h=master> to be the official latest commit (how do I check this using git?): commit 94dbf2fc904ce3446aa513e41edac6a3edaf316d Author: Ben Elliston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon Feb 11 21:48:59 2008 +1100 With this, I've run on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Debian etch, and compared to their dejagnu package (which includes "lots" of current HEAD, so I guess no changes were really expected): - native bootstrap+check testing binutils and gcc trunk r132182 (same revision for tests below). - simulator setups (as stated or implicitly target X-elf + baseboard X-sim; included in dejagnu) hosted on the system above: v850, sh, mmix-knuth-mmixware+mmix, mips, fr30, arm, mcore and mipsisa64-elf+mips-sim-idt64 testing binutils, gcc, newlib and as applicable, sim. - simulator setups for cris-elf and crisv32-elf with the originally submitted cris-sim.exp compared to the cris-sim.exp in HEAD, the rest as above. - simulator multilib setups for cris-elf with the original cris-sim.exp compared to the cris-sim.exp in HEAD, i.e. 'RUNTESTFLAGS=--target_board=cris-sim\{,-march=v10,-march=v32\}'. The rest as above. - simulator setups for cris-axis-linux-gnu and crisv32-axis-linux-gnu with the original cris-sim.exp compared to the cris-sim.exp in HEAD. The rest as above. For crisv32-* one less libstdc++ test timed out doubtlessly due to differences in host load. - sh64-elf with a sh64-sim.exp that Joern Rennecke posted, IIRC. The rest as above. For all the above, the only change, was that dejagnu HEAD had an extra "WARNING: Couldn't find the global config file." for all testsuites, above the the existing "Test Run By hp on Fri Feb 8 12:36:48 2008" or in some testsuites above the "WARNING: Couldn't find tool init file". On a x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Fedora 8 host, testing cris-elf with the original cris-sim.exp compared to the cris-sim.exp in HEAD, against src/sim, binutils and gcc r132266. As posted before, there are some differences compared to the F 8 dejagnu package (which is closer to 1.4.4 than the Debian package), though in all improvements. - Same host, testing src/sim for (X-elf+X-sim) arm, frv, h8300, iq2000, m32r, m68hc11, mcore, mips, sh, v850; no changes. On a x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Fedora core 4 host targetting crisv32-axis-linux-gnu with cris-sim and ditto but a "handcrafted" baseboard file (using telnet and ftp; implementing telnet_exec "manually") for a crisv32-axis-linux-gnu board shows, for sim, binutils and gcc r132252, a few more test-cases passing due to the (as posted) more heavily pruned warnings, e.g. "fesetenv is not implemented and will always fail" and of course the marking non-linking run-tests as unresolved. No other differences attributable to dejagnu. Those are the variations covered by my own "daily" use with some additions. brgds, H-P _______________________________________________ DejaGnu mailing list DejaGnu@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dejagnu
