I'm using my various autotester setups to check dejagnu HEAD for the upcoming (wishfully anyway) 1.5.
I'm not used to git, but "git show" says the latest update is commit 94dbf2fc904ce3446aa513e41edac6a3edaf316d Author: Ben Elliston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon Feb 11 21:48:59 2008 +1100 With that installed, and binutils as of today (exact revision unlikely critical), cris-elf gets an extra FAIL compared to dejagnu-1.4.4-11.fc8 (the Fedora 8 package): Running /tmp/hpautotest-binutils/bsrc/src/ld/testsuite/ld-cris/cris.exp ... FAIL: ld-cris/warn3 with ld.log containing: Executing on host: sh -c {./ld-new -L/tmp/hpautotest-binutils/bsrc/src/ld/testsuite/ld-cris -mcrisaout -o tmpdir/dump tmpdir/dump0.o tmpdir/dump1.o tmpdir/dump2.o 2>&1} /dev/null ld.tmp (timeout = 300) tmpdir/dump1.o:tmpdir/dump1.o:(.text+0x0): warning: isatty is not implemented and will always fail succeeded with: <>, expected: <warning: isatty is not implemented and will always fail$> succeeded with: <>, expected: <warning: isatty is not implemented and will always fail$> FAIL: ld-cris/warn3 At a glance, it seems prune_warnings has become better at pruning... The bottom line is, the fix should probably be local to the ld testsuite, in ld-lib.exp:run_dump_test; either to tweak the test-case so it doesn't match the libgloss warning from which it was derived and which prune_warnings now prunes, or not to apply prune_warnings when a warning or error is expected(!). So, I guess this is just a heads-up for the dejagnu project, with an intent of a patch for the binutils project. brgds, H-P _______________________________________________ DejaGnu mailing list DejaGnu@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dejagnu