On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 02:15:37PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote: > On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 10:44:06PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > Translators should work from CVS preferably; the pot and po files in CVS are > > up to date. > > Huh? You fixed CVS when reading this bugreport, but it was outdated > as well, so it would not have helped at all. Please fix apt building > so that apt-all.pot is updated when packages are built, otherwise this > problem will reappear.
Perhaps it should just be removed from the source tarball. I would rather that translators work from CVS, since otherwise the translations are almost never up to date. > Anyway are you sure that apt-all.pot is complete? It only contains > 286 strings whereas there are around 450 in 0.5.23. > > As a result, all PO files except fr.po (committed after this update) lost > 200 translated strings in this update. (They are still in PO files and > marked as obsolete, and will reappear when apt-all.pot is fixed, but > translators may remove them if they wrongly believe that they are no more > used) It does seem wrong that it shrank so much. I'll try to find out what happened. -- - mdz
