Your message dated Sat, 8 May 2010 00:55:07 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#580563: /usr/lib/libdrm_radeon.so.1: undefined symbol:
drmIoctl
has caused the Debian Bug report #580563,
regarding /usr/lib/libdrm_radeon.so.1: undefined symbol: drmIoctl
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
580563: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=580563
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libdrm-radeon1
Version: 2.4.18-5
Severity: important
On trying to start glxgears or glxinfo, I get the following error message:
> mar...@sorano:~$ LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose glxgears
> libGL: XF86DRIGetClientDriverName: 5.3.0 r300 (screen 0)
> libGL: OpenDriver: trying /usr/lib/dri/tls/r300_dri.so
> libGL: OpenDriver: trying /usr/lib/dri/r300_dri.so
> libGL error: dlopen /usr/lib/dri/r300_dri.so failed (/usr/lib/libdrm_rad
> eon.so.1: undefined symbol: drmIoctl)
> libGL error: unable to load driver: r300_dri.so
> libGL: OpenDriver: trying /usr/lib/dri/tls/swrast_dri.so
> libGL: OpenDriver: trying /usr/lib/dri/swrast_dri.so
As far as I know, I'm using the testing versions of libgl1-mesa-dri,
libdrm-radeon1, libdrm2 and the kernel modules.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-3-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages libdrm-radeon1 depends on:
ii libc6 2.10.2-6 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii libdrm2 2.4.18-5 Userspace interface to kernel DRM
libdrm-radeon1 recommends no packages.
libdrm-radeon1 suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 20:52:14 +0100, Martin Bright wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 23:34 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > drmIoctl is defined in libdrm.so.2. What is the output of
> > ldd /usr/lib/libdrm_radeon.so.1
>
> Aha - I think I can see what the problem is.
>
> mar...@sorano:~$ ldd /usr/lib/libdrm_radeon.so.1
> linux-gate.so.1 => (0xb77a6000)
> libdrm.so.2 => /lib/libdrm.so.2 (0xb777a000)
> libc.so.6 => /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 (0xb7633000)
> /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb77a7000)
> mar...@sorano:~$ ls -l /lib/libdrm.so.2
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 2008-10-28 15:58 /lib/libdrm.so.2 ->
> libdrm.so.2.3.0
> mar...@sorano:~$ ls -l /usr/lib/libdrm.so.2
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 2010-05-04 23:46 /usr/lib/libdrm.so.2 ->
> libdrm.so.2.4.0
>
> Deleting /lib/libdrm.so.2 seems to fix the problem!
>
OK, thanks for the followup. I don't know where that libdrm came from,
but afaik not a Debian package, so closing this bug.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
