Timo Aaltonen wrote: > Finally, here are the leftover bits from xbase-clients and xutils not > found from Fedora: > > # xbase-clients > beforelight > bitmap > ico > xcalc (xbase-apps?) > xdbedizzy > xditview (xbase-apps?) > xedit (xbase-apps?) > xf86dga > xgc > xman (xbase-apps?) > xmore (xbase-apps?)
Note that ico, xcalc, xdbedizzy, xditview, xedit, xgc, xman, xmore might be dropped by upstream in the future (see http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2007-April/023355.html) Are you planning to split the binary package only or also the source? Regarding what Fedora does, I don't see why we would have to split into so many packages. Moving xauth in its own package seems important. Splitting all tiny client from server utilities too. However, for instance, I don't see why appres/editres/listres/viewres would need to be in their own xbase-resutils, they could stay with xrdb or something like that. Also the difference between xfonts-utils and xfs programs does not look easy to understand. my 2 cents... Brice -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
