On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 23:11:31 +0300, Riku Saikkonen wrote: > Hi, > > Julien Cristau <[email protected]> writes: > >can you check if the change I've made makes sense? (And if we need to > >keep the xterm-debian definition for backwards-compatibility reasons?) > > Just a note from an outsider that follows debian-x every now and then: > maybe it would be useful to keep the comment that refers to Debian > Policy 9.8? The idea being that it gives a reference to a "rationale" > for the backspace behavior, so if someone has a broken backspace and > examines the termcap or terminfo entry, the comment would point them > somewhere that explains the situation (and, perhaps more importantly, > reminds the reader that this is something that needs to be kept > consistent and is thus specified in a policy, and changing it in one > place could break things somewhere else). > Restored the pointer to Policy 9.8, thanks for the suggestion.
Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
