On Wednesday 17 June 2009 13:44:28 Reinhard Tartler wrote: > Andres Mejia <mcita...@gmail.com> writes: > > What headaches? Forgive my lack of imagination here. Right now I don't > > see a reason why static libraries should be removed. > > I'm not for removing, I'm more for not introducing them in the first > place. > > Recent problem (fail to find the bugno, sry), libjack-dev used to ship a > .la file, which has been dropped. Other libraries that can use jack > still referenced the jack.la in their own .la fail, which rendered > application to FTBFS. Solution: recompile the intermediate libraries to > drop the reference .la file. > > As said, aybe I'm really just overexaggerating here and try to be too > cautious. alure seems a really small library with rather few users, so > it probably doesn't matter here.
ALURE doesn't even provide those libtool files, only a shared library and static library. -- Regards, Andres -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
