MJ Ray <m...@phonecoop.coop> wrote: > Damyan Ivanov <d...@debian.org> wrote: > > [Please Cc me on replies. Thanks] > > Most of the code is licensed under "the same terms as Perl itself", > [...] > > In addition to that, some icons are licensed under LGPL-3+, and some > > more icons are licensed under GPL-2. > > > > From how I understand it, if we choose GPL-2 for the main code, that > > still leaves the combination of GPL-2 (code and some .png icons) and > > LGPL-3+ (.png icons). Is such aggregation OK? > > If it's mere aggregation, I believe each stays under their own licence.
Just to be clear, if it is not mere aggregation, then it is not ok. If the LGPL-3+ icons are required for the program to operate correctly, that is a hint that licenses need to be compatible with GPL-2. Cheers, Walter Landry wlan...@caltech.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
