On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 02:19:30PM +0000, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > packages. Also feel free to start a public discussion on > debian-de...@lists.debian.org about the issue, including any relevant > information from this email, in order to gather opinions from other > project members.
Lacking any reply from you, discussion took place http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2008/11/thrd2.html#00599 http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2008/12/threads.html#00005 http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2008/12/threads.html#00077 I can't see a wide consensus supporting your position to reject qmail and related packages permanently. Do you have any further comments on the netqmail and related packages, or an estimation when you get to process them? On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 08:33:31AM +0000, Gerrit Pape wrote: > On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 10:17:22PM +0000, Debian Installer wrote: > > (new) netqmail_1.06-2.diff.gz extra mail > > (new) netqmail_1.06-2.dsc extra mail > > (new) netqmail_1.06.orig.tar.gz extra mail > > (new) qmail-uids-gids_1.06-2_all.deb extra mail > > Hi, do you have any further comments on the netqmail and related > packages, or an estimation when you get to process them? > > Regards, Gerrit. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
