Shouldn't the package name include "ocaml" somewhere? Doesn't ocaml have some sort of standard package/library package-naming convention?
Something like this is pretty clearly language specific (many languages have json i/o libraries). Including "ocaml" in the package name would both be much more convenient for the user (when searching for something like a json support library, often one must wade through a lot of inapplicable packages), and safer against future name collision to include ocaml. Thanks, -Miles -- Twice, adv. Once too often. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
