On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 09:24:18AM -0500, Dustin Kirkland wrote: > "Fixing the functionality" provided by the LTP is a noble goal, and I > absolutely support this. However, that should be done upstream with the > LTP community.
Agreed. > I'm offering to update the nearly-two-year-old Debian LTP package to > something more recent, and continue maintaining and improving the > package. I would like to focus the current discussion on pertinent > packaging issues that need to be solved for this to happen. With the control file changes I think the ltp should be acceptable, or atleast better than it is _now_. Lets not have "perfect" as the enemy of "better than now" :) Can we agree on a action plan? I'm still ready to sponsor.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
