On Wed Apr 30 06:54, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > * Package name : jit
Isn't this a bit generic? would rjit, r-jit or jit-r be better? Matt -- Matthew Johnson
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed Apr 30 06:54, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > * Package name : jit
Isn't this a bit generic? would rjit, r-jit or jit-r be better? Matt -- Matthew Johnson
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature