I did some testing with the new OpenAL libraries with ogreal. ogreal performs better on the new libraries then they do with the other ones. When I say "perform better", I mean all the ogreal demos actually run (as opposed to some of them segfaulting).
I think "openal-soft" should instead be named "openal" and thus be the new version of openal. Maybe we could upload a package to experimental first to start testing it. Could anyone provide a list of the reverse dependencies for openal? I would like to test a few more packages with the new openal libraries. -- Regards, Andres -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
