On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 15:32:21 +0100 Ondrej Certik wrote: > Hi Francesco,
Hi! :) > > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 12:23:00AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: [...] > > I wonder if you managed to link Paraview against (and make it work > > properly with) libraries already packaged and included in Debian. > > Not yet. Currently we are still trying to make it compile on i386 and > amd64 together with MPI and python. We just succeeded in the compilation > itself, so at least the package builds now. I see. > > Unfortunately, the python scripting still isn't working at runtime. When > this is fixed, only then we'll try to build shared libraries and reuse > as much as possible from Debian to reduce the sice of the paraview > binary package (currently 100MB). Really huge! I hope you soon manage to successfully package it without the "extraneous" libraries! [...] > If you would like to help us, it'd be awesome. I'm afraid I do not (yet) have enough packaging experience to help out... I should start packaging something easier, first! ;-) Bye, and good luck! -- http://frx.netsons.org/progs/scripts/refresh-pubring.html New! Version 0.6 available! What? See for yourself! ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpguHZdls8EB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
