Hi,

I would like to adopt this package. I've been taking a look at it but I'm 
interesting in your last opinion before you get released of this package. A 
part from the outstanding bug you have forwarded to upstream, and the fact of 
a new warning on the code about using whrandom which have been deprecated in 
favor of random, what else do you think I should take in consideration?

Thanks

Pablo

Attachment: pgp4Gkrvl5fnW.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to