On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Jason Spiro wrote:
> Sami, would the Artistic License 2.0 be OK? ( > http://www.perlfoundation.org/legal/licenses/artistic-2_0.html ) It > states that when the package is redistributed, one can charge a > distribution fee, but not a license fee. This prevents a record > companies from selling the CD. However, the music could still be > freely redistributed noncommercially, even if separated from the game. We'll contact Teosto and see which license would be okay with them. Tommi had the objection that the Artistic License is a bit too software-centric, altough I don't know if there are any well known licenses written specifically for music. > > The tutorial is still a bit of a grey area (is it a song?), but > > GPL is okay for the other data files. > > Is it a song? It doesn't seem to fit the dictionary definition of > "song" to me. IIRC, isn't it just a prepared speech with musical > interludes at various points? We agreed that the tutorial can also be included with the other data files as GPL. I doubt anyone will regard it as a song by itself. - Sami -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
