Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The package is fine. However, just wondering, as I did use dpatch to do > the upstream modifications, it would be more beautiful if you do so with > the manpage corrections too, or, drop dpatch completely and replace it > with the patch management system you prefere (or to even not use a patch > management system at all). > > Let me know how you intend to do it, and I'm happy to sponsor the package.
I agree using dpatch is better so I've made the appropriate changes and reuploaded. I'm a big fan of darcs and am evaluating darcs-buildpackage but for now, just using dpatch is definitely better than directly modifying the source. Thanks, -- ========================================================= David D. Smith <davidsmith at acm.org> Jabber/GoogleTalk: dds at jabber.org ; GPG: 0xE6511C7E IRC: dds on irc.freenode.net ; MSN: dds4418 at hotmail.com ==========================================================
pgp21XHhnyI3q.pgp
Description: PGP signature
