On Fri 30. June 2006 06:56, Daniel Glassey wrote: > Thanks for the reminder. I had uploaded it but it was rejected > (message below). I'm waiting for Luke to make a new version > and tell me (I guess we both forgot). I'm on holiday at the > moment but I'll look at the packaging next time I have a > chance (might not be for a few weeks).
Just to make some references for further study (BTW, does Ubuntu follow DFSG or their QA is not that good and it slipped through the cracks?). This is the decision about GFDL http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_001#outcome and the conclusion is that "GFDL-licensed works without unmodifiable sections are free", which means that documentation for kio-sword should be OK. How to persuade Debian ftpmaster, that he/she should make kio-sword in? Best, Matěj -- GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB 25C3 E09F EF25 D964 84AC http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/blog/, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 23 Marion St. #3, (617) 876-1259, ICQ 132822213 [...] sleep is no substitute for caffeine. -- Robert Storey in review of Debian (when describing re-compilation of kernel :-)
pgpxS1jsEl6l0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
