Damián Viano wrote: > This ended up being a complex/useless package for many reasons. > If 1 binary package is created then: > * You have several sources > * You have a lot of dependencies > * Each script requires different handling/setup to work
I really don't see why this is complex or useless. I agree this could be the best approach, to deliver one big package with all dependencies covered and all the sources included. If each script needs handling/setup, is there anything the user is not supposed to do? I mean, the user configuration is obviously needed by such a tool. > I would like to hear if someone have creative solutions to the > problems stated and even would consider retaking the package. Meanwhile > I'm dropping the ITP. I really, really can't see the problem. -- David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://www.damog.net/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GPG: C671257D Esto va a ser como un dolor de muelas.
