Your message dated Sat, 22 Oct 2005 05:47:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327628: fixed in xwit 3.4-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Sep 2005 13:34:07 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 11 06:34:07 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from shadowland.snow-crash.org (ned.snow-crash.org) [80.190.250.253]
(postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EERyB-0000lI-00; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 06:34:07 -0700
Received: from nahar.localdomain (vs5-deb.fnb.maschinenbau.tu-darmstadt.de
[130.83.174.41])
by ned.snow-crash.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AB4C3359E
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 15:34:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=nahar.localdomain)
by nahar.localdomain with esmtp (Exim 4.52)
id 1EERy8-0003gx-L1
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 15:34:04 +0200
From: Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: very old package with RC bugs, should this be orphaned?
Organization: CPU+Mainboard-FAQ: http://www.dch-faq.de/
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 15:34:04 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) XEmacs/21.4.17 (linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: xwit
Version: 3.4-6
Severity: serious
Hi,
During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we begun
to go through the list of the oldest packages in Debian that are not in
testing (http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/oldest.html) to search for packages
that should be either orphaned or removed completly from Debian
(unstable and testing) since they have been obviously neglected by their
maintainer.
Your package did show up on this list and we propose to orphan it.
This usually means that your package matched some of the following
criteria:
[1] Your packages has not had an upload for more than two years
[2] has one or more RC bugs with no answer from the maintainer (**)
[3] the state of your packages in general seems to indicate that you
might be MIA
[4] (if we propose a removal) it shows in popcon as having less than
100 users with the package installed.
[5] the package was not released with sarge
and at least ([1] and ( [2] or [3] or [4] or [5] )) was true.
(**) The maintainer not answering to RC bugs refers to bugs filed
more than one month before the time the check was performed.
After 7 days without answer from you (the maintainer) we will reassign
this bug to either WNPP (in case we propose to orphan it) or
ftp.debian.org (in case we propose to remove it).
The package will need an upload or an explanation for this action not to
proceed.
Please do *not* upload a package just to get off this list - it won't
help the package at all. Maintainers should be responsive and feel
responsible for their packages without needing other people to force
them to do work. Sometimes, finding a new maintainer or even removing
the package completly from the archive is better for Debian's users.
Thanks!
Marc
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 327628-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Oct 2005 12:48:58 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 22 05:48:57 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ETIm9-0006VB-00; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 05:47:05 -0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bernhard R. Link)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#327628: fixed in xwit 3.4-8
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 05:47:05 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: xwit
Source-Version: 3.4-8
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xwit, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
xwit_3.4-8.diff.gz
to pool/main/x/xwit/xwit_3.4-8.diff.gz
xwit_3.4-8.dsc
to pool/main/x/xwit/xwit_3.4-8.dsc
xwit_3.4-8_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xwit/xwit_3.4-8_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Bernhard R. Link <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated xwit package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 12:08:33 +0200
Source: xwit
Binary: xwit
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.4-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bernhard R. Link <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
xwit - a collection of simple routines to call some X11 functions
Closes: 327628 334921
Changes:
xwit (3.4-8) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Adopting this package (Closes: #327628)
* repackage
- getting rid of dpatch
- make description more like I like it
- build with custom Makefile, getting rid of imake
* adding patch from Decklin Foster (Closes: #334921)
Files:
f13adfc542ae97fc4ddced12c03a9131 608 x11 optional xwit_3.4-8.dsc
9b4c4719af474b030d8076fed844d3a7 11357 x11 optional xwit_3.4-8.diff.gz
128885c145a25dedb4608cddd7f3c6b9 17454 x11 optional xwit_3.4-8_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQFDWjIxTrAWvKplQe4RAgs0AJ49yHOuTOw81i1c+1T40ZH1dTrzJACeNnGh
69BNdshvVZUJ4he/8laWeh8=
=XvAL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
