Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:00:54 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Jun 2004 10:30:27 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 02 03:30:27 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from opal.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de [134.99.176.7] (root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BVT0t-0004R9-00; Wed, 02 Jun 2004 03:30:27 -0700
Received: from opal.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by opal.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/Debian-1) with
ESMTP id i52AUP8Q005152;
Wed, 2 Jun 2004 12:30:25 +0200
Received: from localhost ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by opal.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/Debian-1) with
ESMTP id i52AUOKw005148;
Wed, 2 Jun 2004 12:30:24 +0200
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 12:30:23 +0200 (CEST)
From: Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: Jens Schmalzing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 2.6.6 kernel - which one?
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.6
Version: 2.6.6-2
Severity: wishlist
> > Btw, is there a workaround of some sort that powerbook users are
> > using since the suspend does not work? Is shutting down the only
> > way?
>
> No, you can also use an older Powerbook where sleep is supported by Linux :)
>
> And there's a suspend-to-disk patch floating around, but I haven't
> tried it yet - mostly because nobody has filed a wishlist bug asking
> for it to be included in the official kernel. So right now, it
> involves recompiling the kernel yourself. Look for pmdisk if you're
> interested.
Since you asked for it: please include the pmdisk patch, currently
maintained by Guido Guenther, in kernel-patch-powerpc. Together with
appropriate invocation of suspend in pwrctl-local, this should keep people
with broken video drivers happy (suspend in place of sleep).
I've not heard of any problems with the patch other than suspend breaking
due to broken modules still loaded - pwrctl-local can take care of that,
too. Any generic power event scripting framework will also be capable of
supporting suspend.
Laptops unsupported for sleep mode is a rather serious bug, and suspend as
a workaround to fix that would be good to have. My only reason to not
raise the severity is that pmdisk might be replace by something even more
incomprehensible in future. There is some controversy to the effect that
this already happened, though.
With apologies to Douglas Adams,
Michael
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 252247-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2005 22:00:55 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 21 15:00:55 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from merkel.debian.org [192.25.206.16] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EICe7-0005Hv-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 15:00:55 -0700
Received: from damog by merkel.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EICe6-0004Xi-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:00:54 -0600
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: WNPP bug closing
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:00:54 -0600
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Hello,
This is an automatic mail sent to close the RFP you have reported or
are involved with.
Your RFP wnpp bug is being closed because of the following reasons:
- It is, as of today, older than 450 days.
- It hasn't had any activity recently.
As this an automatic procedure, it could of course have something
wrong and probably it would be closing some bugs that are not
intended by owners and submitters (like you) to be closed, for
example if the RFP is still of your interest, or there has been
some kind of activity around it. In that case, please reopen the
bug, do it, DO IT NOW! (I don't want to be blamed because of
mass closing and not let people know that they can easily reopen
their bugs ;-).
To re-open it, you simply have to mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a body text like this:
reopen 252247
thanks bts
Further comments on the work done in the bug sent to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] would be truly welcomed.
Anyway, if you have any kind of problems when dealing with
the BTS, feel free to contact me and I'd be more than happy to help
you on this: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
This is the second massive wnpp closing that is being done. The next close
will be done on inactive RFPs older than 365 days and finally, an automatic
script will close, by default, *inactive* RFPs when they reach one year of
inactivity.
A similar process is being applied to other kind of wnpp bugs.
Thanks for your cooperation,
-- David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 20 Sep 2005 17:06:42 -0500
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
