Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:02 -0500 (CDT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 May 2005 20:52:53 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 14 13:52:53 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from fep30-0.kolumbus.fi (fep30-app.kolumbus.fi) [193.229.0.32]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DX3cy-0004ug-00; Sat, 14 May 2005 13:52:52 -0700
Received: from bongo.cante.net ([81.197.3.110]) by fep30-app.kolumbus.fi
with ESMTP
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 14 May 2005 23:52:50 +0300
Received: from mx2.cante.net ([192.168.1.3]:1053 helo=cante.cante.net)
by bongo.cante.net with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1DX3cs-00057M-3x; Sat, 14 May 2005 23:52:46 +0300
Received: from jaalto by cante.cante.net with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DX3bm-0002rQ-N5; Sat, 14 May 2005 23:51:38 +0300
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jari Aalto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RFP: browsex -- Small fast and lightweigh browser for CSS, DHTML,
animated graphics
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.12
Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 23:51:38 +0300
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,PORN_4
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : browsex
Version : 2.0.0
Upstream Author : Peter MacDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://browsex.com/
* License : GPL
Description : Small based fast and lightweigh broeswer for CSS, DHTML,
animated graphics
(Include the long description here.)
o lightweight: starting at 3.8 Meg and works on a 12M/386 (in X!)
o Packaged as a single standalone binary, that you can modify!
o improved configurability, and tighter OS integration
o better fault resilience and crash proofing
o reliable client side scripting via Safe-Tcl
o an embedded macro processor: TML. Standalone to!
o less-mouse, and mouse-less operational support
o configuration defaults adapt to available resources
BrowseX is a free Open Source, cross-platform Web Browser, Mail
Program, Talk/Chat client and more. There is a database interface,
SQLite, and BrowseX is easily extensible via an API. BrowseX has been
written primarily in C and Tcl and clearly demonstrates that Linux
applications can indeed bridge to Windows. The user can also
dynamically configure any widget, even form fields in web pages, on
the fly using Shift-Control-mousebutton. You may also want to look at
TML, a CGI and Web Script that BrowseX has built-in. The
http://dev.browsex.com/ site now uses the TML CGI to display the
BrowseX documentation as TML directly.
For the user, BrowseX has two principle characteristics: resilience
and responsiveness. The first comes really as a side effect of using
Tcl for all highlevel algorithms. Errors result in popup dialogs
rather than crashes. Responsiveness is probably due to lightweight and
the widget based implementation which forced clean interfaces between
parts.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 95855-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Sep 2005 02:55:08 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 14 19:55:08 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl-201-129-37-187.prod-infinitum.com.mx (cerdita.damog.net)
[201.129.37.187]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EFjtz-0000NS-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:55:08 -0700
Received: by cerdita.damog.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 5C74E107866; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:02 -0500 (CDT)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: WNPP bug closed
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:02 -0500 (CDT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Moreno Garza)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 368
Hello,
This is an automatic mail sent to close the RFP you have reported or
are involved with.
Your RFP wnpp bug is being closed because of the following reasons:
- It is, as of today, older than 600 days.
- It haven't had any activity recently.
- The amount of ITPs on the Debian BTS is huge and we need to
clean up a bit the place.
As this an automatic procedure, it could of course have something
wrong and probably it would be closing some bugs that are not
intended by owners and submitters (like you) to be closed, for
example if the RFP is still of your interest, or there has been
some kind of activity around it. In that case, please reopen the
bug, do it, DO IT NOW! (I don't want to be blamed because of
mass closing and not let people know that they can easily reopen
their bugs ;-).
To re-open it, you simply have to mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a body text like this:
reopen 123456
thanks bts
Replacing '123456' for the number of your RFP bug. The subject of the
mail is ignored. Or if you have any kind of problems when dealing with
the BTS, feel free to contact me and I'd be more than happy to help
you on this: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
This is the first mass wnpp closing that will be done. The next close
will be done on inactive RFPs older than 450 days and finally, the
ones older than 365 days (an automatic script will close *inactive*
RFPs when they reach one year old).
A similar process is being applied to the ITP wnpp bugs in these
days.
Thanks for your cooperation,
-- David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:54:42 -0500
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
