Hello Adrian!

I'm sorry, but I didn't receive your mail, so I saw your post only
now.

On Mon 06 Jun 2005 17:15 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 12:06:14PM +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
>>...
>> BTW, the CVS source already contains a debian/ folder, as the author
>> accepted to let rfc2388 become a Debian native package :-)
>
> Please don't package it as a native Debian package.

That was the conclusion we (Janis, cl-rfc2388's author, Peter and me)
arrived after having discussed in the last months. And that was also
the conclusion the cl-debian mailing-list arrived, please see posts
[1] and [2].

So, while the cl-rfc2388's CVS (and, unfortunately, version 1.0)
contains a debian/ folder, I'm going to ask Janis to delete it.

An then I'll finish packaging cl-rfc2388, so it could finally enter
Debian official.

> This avoids several problems like e.g. an NMU uploading a new
> upstream version having a higher version number than the maintainer
> upload of this version.

Those were exactly what we had fear of ;-)

Thx, bye,
Gismo / Luca

PS, Peter, sorry for the double mail, but I wasn't sure the BTS
will forward my mail to the bug submitter.

[1] http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian/2005-June/000045.html
[2] http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian/2005-July/000177.html

Attachment: pgpl16sViiVFZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to