On Friday 17 December 2004 23:13, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 10:48:12PM +0100, Frederik Dannemare wrote: > > wnpp needs a little cleanup. Thus, your ITP will be retitled to an > > RFP in 30 days, unless the original submitter, current owner, or > > somebody else within that 30 day time frame confirms interest in > > the ITP by actively working on packaging. > > > > Confirmation of interest is sent as follow-up to > > <ITP#>@bugs.debian.org and preferably CC me. That way it's easier > > for me to track which ITPs should be retitled (alternatively, do > > the retitling yourself (and CC me). Thanks in advance. > > > > Justification: ITP was submitted more than 1000 days ago, and there > > has been no real activity/progress for a long, long time. > > > > If you think I'm being unreasonable or if you believe that I, in > > any other way, have wrongfully addressed your particular ITP with > > this mail, let me know. > > Shouldn't this message have gone to the -submitter addresses?
Btw, I forgot to ask: Besides notifying the submitter of any such future mails (ITP "overdue" warning), should I then send a copy to [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of sending it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Best regards, -- Frederik Dannemare | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=Frederik+Dannemare http://frederik.dannemare.net | http://www.linuxworlddomination.dk
