Your message dated Mon, 8 Nov 2004 10:33:18 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#280208: O: qmailadmin
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Nov 2004 02:39:59 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 07 18:39:59 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from moya.zyxel.no [212.125.177.50]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CQzRn-0008UH-00; Sun, 07 Nov 2004 18:39:59 -0800
Received: from [217.199.59.230] (helo=[10.0.0.3] ident=lompefjes)
by moya.zyxel.no with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1CQzAO-0001bw-00; Mon, 08 Nov 2004 03:22:00 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Christer Mjellem Strand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: O: qmailadmin
Bcc: Christer Mjellem Strand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2004 03:39:54 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
It would seem this package needs to be orphaned. There has been no apparent
work done on it since it's initial release over
a year ago, even though there have been many upstream releases since then. New
upstream versions would also close all
currently reported bugs, and yet the package hasn't been upgraded, ref. #235778
& #242806
Can you check up on the maintainer to see if he's still interested?
Thanks.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 280208-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Nov 2004 09:33:33 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 08 01:33:33 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from a-eskwadraat.nl [131.211.34.218]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CR5u1-0007EI-00; Mon, 08 Nov 2004 01:33:33 -0800
Received: from jeroen by A-Eskwadraat.nl with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1CR5tm-0001lm-00; Mon, 08 Nov 2004 10:33:18 +0100
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 10:33:18 +0100
To: Christer Mjellem Strand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Sam Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#280208: O: qmailadmin
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 03:39:54AM +0100, Christer Mjellem Strand wrote:
> It would seem this package needs to be orphaned. There has been no
> apparent work done on it since it's initial release over a year ago,
> even though there have been many upstream releases since then. New
> upstream versions would also close all currently reported bugs, and
> yet the package hasn't been upgraded, ref. #235778 & #242806
>
> Can you check up on the maintainer to see if he's still interested?
Of course, but such a request is not done by just orphaning his package,
but by asking on debian-qa, for example.
Only orphan a package _after_ you've concluded the maintainer shows no
reaction. It's also polite to at least cc the maintainer when you orphan
his package, so he knows you've done so, in stead of only when someone
goes to much efforts to take it over, and then discovers it's an hijack
after all.
In the past, the maintainer wrote:
| I have a 1.2.1 package, but it doesn't compile. Nor does the one at
| http://www.rnd-software.com/debian/ for that matter.
If someone interested in qmail wants to NMU the package towards the
newest version, he is hereby invited to do so. Sam, please let us know
when you've got time again to look after your packages.
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
