Your message dated Tue, 31 Aug 2004 20:55:16 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing outdated RFPs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jul 2002 15:56:55 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 22 10:56:55 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from debian30.math.uwaterloo.ca (debian30.math) [129.97.82.27] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17WfYN-0002Nj-00; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 10:56:55 -0500
Received: from wtautz by debian30.math with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 17WfYK-0004pj-00; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 11:56:52 -0400
From: Walter Tautz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: O: gambc
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 11:56:52 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Walter Tautz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-07-22
Severity: normal
There use to be a package called gambc in potato. Contains
the Gambit-C compiler available at
http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~gambit/
The previous maintainer Karl M. Hegbloom sent me the following:
On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 08:27, Walter Tautz wrote:
> Hello, I just noticed that gambc is not in woody or unstable.
> Do you plan to provide a gambc package (I believe there is
> a version 4? ...not sure about that)
No. AFAIK, it's up for adoption.
However it does not appear to be listed in the orphaned packages...
maybe I didn't look to closely....
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux debian30.math 2.4.18-bf2.4 #1 Sam Mär 30 00:56:06 CET 2002 i586
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 153884-done) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Aug 2004 18:54:48 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 31 11:54:48 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de) [193.22.164.111]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C2DmK-0006eW-00; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 11:54:48 -0700
Received: from pd9589a37.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.88.154.55] helo=legolas)
by vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de with asmtp
(TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16)
(Exim 4.34)
id 1C2DmJ-0002RM-B7; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 20:54:47 +0200
Received: from jmm by legolas with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1C2Dmn-0000a6-4H; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 20:55:17 +0200
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 20:55:16 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040818i
From: Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 217.88.154.55
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Closing outdated RFPs
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.0 (built Sat, 24 Apr 2004 12:31:30 +0200)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 55
This RFP has been closed as it is very old and the requested program
isn't even under active maintenance since at least two years. If the
program is really important to you, please revive it upstream first.
Cheers,
Moritz
