> > We'd need someone to review the open bugs, and implement the > > features/fixes that are deemed to be worthwhile. (I have some rough > > ideas about the non-dpatch-edit-patch bugs, and I'm happy to explain > > them to anyone volunteering to help.) > > > > It's not something hard or anything, just takes more time I actually > > have, and will have in the near future. > Actually I would like to help out, but currently I am also limited in > time. If everything goes well, I can devote time to dpatch in September > and later. I think it's way off for you guys, as I bet you want to shake > dpatch into shape for Sarge. :-|
It's pretty much in good shape for Sarge, no problem there. It's just that the bug list is getting too long, and there are some patches/ideas out there which would make it easier to use dpatch. It's not a big deal if those don't make it into Sarge. (Later, when people start to depened on those features, yet want to backport their packages, backporting dpatch is trivial; just copy it from unstable :)
