Your message dated Sat, 31 Jul 2004 17:08:04 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Package exists in the archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 May 2004 22:34:38 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 15 15:34:37 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from armagnac.ifi.unizh.ch (albatross.madduck.net) [130.60.75.72]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BP7jp-00056b-00; Sat, 15 May 2004 15:34:37 -0700
Received: from localhost (albatross [127.0.0.1])
by albatross.madduck.net (postfix) with ESMTP id ACB9893AC
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 16 May 2004 00:34:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from wall.madduck.net (80-219-162-195.dclient.hispeed.ch
[80.219.162.195])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "wall.madduck.net", Issuer "madduck.net CA" (verified OK))
by albatross.madduck.net (postfix) with ESMTP id B7B3C916A
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 16 May 2004 00:34:33 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from piper.madduck.net (piper.madduck.net [192.168.14.4])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "piper.madduck.net", Issuer "madduck.net CA" (not verified))
by wall.madduck.net (postfix) with ESMTP id 60E89699
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 16 May 2004 00:34:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by piper.madduck.net (postfix, from userid 1000)
id 348CAA8A; Sun, 16 May 2004 00:34:31 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 16 May 2004 00:34:31 +0200
From: martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ITP: libfactory++ -- C++ template factory framework
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.56
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Organization: Debian GNU/Linux
X-OS: Debian GNU/Linux testing/unstable kernel 2.6.4-piper i686
X-Motto: Keep the good times rollin'
X-Subliminal-Message: debian/rules!
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
X-Virus-Scanned: by albatross.madduck.net
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : libfactory++
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Martin F. Krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://cvs.ailab.ch/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/libfactory%2B%2B
* License : Artistic
Description : C++ template factory framework
libfactory++ is a C++ template framework for run-time dynamic type
instantiation. You can register single classes or whole hierarchies, and t=
hen
tell libfactory++ to instantiate objects using the registration key. For
instance, if you register class A with key 1 and a child class A::B with k=
ey
2, then you could say create(1) to obtain a pointer to a newly allocated a=
nd
constructed A object, or create(2) to return an A* containing a new instan=
ce
of A::B.
.
libfactory++ differs from other factory approaches mainly in its flexibili=
ty.
For one, libfactory++ can use any constructor a type supports, and allows =
you
to choose (and configure) the constructor to use for each call to create().
Second, it supports custom allocators, allowing you to use e.g. a memory p=
ool
rather than continuous invocations of 'new'.
.
Note that the library is not (yet) complete and it's not thoroughly tested.
However, given the effort and grief I went through in writing it, I would
like to make it available to folks, get people to test it, and hopefully h=
ave
some peeps submit improvements.
.
It's not yet documented, although the usage should be fairly straight
forward. I am hoping to find someone else to document it as I suck at
documentation and as the author, it's exceptionally difficult to stay
didactically correct.
.
libfactory++ only exists as a -dev package as it's only a bunch of C++ hea=
der
files. Therefore, no static or shared library is necessary, allowing for
ultimate flexibility.
--=20
Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them!
=20
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : proud Debian developer, admin, and user
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
=20
Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
--7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAppr3IgvIgzMMSnURAoSgAJ9yUMMKvxY3Zx3cLsdyoc967J2XKwCgnBMG
kCG806JPelMTu6CnKPkIuWU=
=FBic
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 249201-done) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Jul 2004 23:08:05 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 31 16:08:05 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from merkel.debian.org [192.25.206.16] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Br2xR-0005jB-00; Sat, 31 Jul 2004 16:08:05 -0700
Received: from djpig by merkel.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Br2xQ-0006x1-00; Sat, 31 Jul 2004 17:08:04 -0600
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2004 17:08:04 -0600
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Package exists in the archive
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
It seems that this package already exists in the archive. If you have
uploaded the package yourself but forgotten to close this WNPP bug, please
read the instructions at http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp for handling
WNPP bugs properly. You should close WNPP bugs in your initial upload
with a statement like "Initial upload. (Closes: #249201)". Thanks.
Of course, it might also be that someone else uploading this package,
in which case the statements above don't apply -- in any case, the package
seems to be in the archive now.
Information about the package already in the archive:
Package: libfactory++
Binary: libfactory++-dev
Version: 0.1.4-1
Priority: optional
Section: libs
Maintainer: martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (>= 4.0.0)
Architecture: all
Standards-Version: 3.6.1
Format: 1.0
Directory: pool/main/libf/libfactory++
Files: 49a2d824efac5a183c64036a17403520 595 libfactory++_0.1.4-1.dsc
44685d23e627663510e49aa853415b6e 73387 libfactory++_0.1.4.orig.tar.gz
d0faaa170a4ee8bf2b418660691d2ad2 24603 libfactory++_0.1.4-1.diff.gz
