Your message dated Wed, 21 Jul 2004 15:31:26 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#259142 - done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jul 2004 06:20:09 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 12 23:20:08 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 118.19.233.220.exetel.com.au (fig.snowfrog.net) [220.233.19.118]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BkGe8-0005ID-00; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 23:20:08 -0700
Received: (qmail 5552 invoked by uid 1002); 13 Jul 2004 06:20:03 -0000
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 16:20:03 +1000
From: Sonia Hamilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ITP: rtfreader -- A portable application/ms-rtf parser
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="huq684BweRXVnRxX"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.50
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--huq684BweRXVnRxX
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2004-07-13
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : rtfreader
Version : unversioned
Upstream Author : Brandon Long [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.fiction.net/blong/programs/#rtf
* License : to be checked
Description : A portable application/ms-rtf parser
I'm going to attempt to create an official debian package for rtfreader.
--
Sonia IM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] =20
--huq684BweRXVnRxX
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkDzfxMACgkQJJB5E6i3cjhUggCePW9i/MRUI1tuGcmtkFe7AhyT
NogAn2PkizokukTGGC9CgrP6e05frMi9
=C+Nz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--huq684BweRXVnRxX--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 259142-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jul 2004 05:38:20 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 20 22:38:20 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 118.19.233.220.exetel.com.au (fig.snowfrog.net) [220.233.19.118]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bn9o4-00025d-00; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 22:38:20 -0700
Received: (qmail 4079 invoked by uid 1002); 21 Jul 2004 05:31:26 -0000
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 15:31:26 +1000
From: Sonia Hamilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug#259142 - done
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Bug#259142 - done.
I'm closing this bug (rather than issuing an RFP) because, as Peter
Eisentraut said:
> I think you will find that the package has no license, and since the
> author says that he copied half the code from Microsoft, that means
> that he will not be able to grant one, either.=20
--
Sonia
--FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkD9/64ACgkQJJB5E6i3cjj2UgCfd5TUijhlnUSfd/p8Ai0RY4F0
31sAmgPbXt5GM0MknYqEqn6eCWJ+8P3d
=AZ7/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5--
