Your message dated Sun, 11 Jul 2004 14:11:53 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line upload accepted
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jun 2004 08:40:27 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 30 01:40:27 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zbasel.fortytwo.ch [212.254.206.135]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bfadn-0003Ns-00; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 01:40:27 -0700
Received: from pc-4514.ethz.ch (pc-4514.ethz.ch [129.132.57.72])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "pc-4514.ethz.ch", Issuer "fortytwo.ch CA certificate"
(verified OK))
by zbasel.fortytwo.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77B735AF;
Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:40:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by pc-4514.ethz.ch (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id E1E5925DA10; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:40:24 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RFP: postgrey -- Greylisting implementation for Postfix
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.61
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:40:24 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Since greylistd seems to be exim-centric, and the greylist script
included with postfix has some issues (according to postgrey's homepage)
* Package name : postgrey
Version : 1.11
Upstream Author : David Schweikert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://isg.ee.ethz.ch/tools/postgrey/
* License : GPL
Description : Greylisting implementation for Postfix
A policy server implementation for postfix 2.1 implementing greylisting.
Greylisting means that you reject email from a server on the first try,
using the fact that most spammers do not retry to send their email,
whereas most normal mail servers do.
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (700, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable'), (60, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.6
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: get my key from http://fortytwo.ch/gpg/92082481
iKcEARECAGcFAkDifHhgGmh0dHA6Ly9mb3J0eXR3by5jaC9sZWdhbC9ncGcvZW1h
aWwuMjAwMjA4MjI/dmVyc2lvbj0xLjUmbWQ1c3VtPTVkZmY4NjhkMTE4NDMyNzYw
NzFiMjVlYjcwMDZkYTNlAAoJECqqZti935l6m+QAn31HEXyJxPohbZdfLSL1cZBe
+roGAJ0cwLCFxouUbmy1k+Lgi/wz0Cz/jQ==
=vzIF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 256969-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jul 2004 12:12:02 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 11 05:12:02 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from armagnac.ifi.unizh.ch (albatross.madduck.net) [130.60.75.72]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BjdBa-0006uU-00; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 05:12:02 -0700
Received: from localhost (albatross.madduck.net [127.0.0.1])
by albatross.madduck.net (postfix) with ESMTP id 28375A613
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 14:11:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by albatross.madduck.net (postfix, from userid 1000)
id DDE484B9E; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 14:11:53 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 14:11:53 +0200
From: martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: upload accepted
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2"
Content-Disposition: inline
Organization: Debian GNU/Linux
X-OS: Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 kernel 2.6.7-albatross i686
X-Motto: Keep the good times rollin'
X-Subliminal-Message: debian/rules!
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
X-Virus-Scanned: by albatross.madduck.net
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
=2E.. but i had a spelling mistake in debian/changelog:
- * Sponsored upload by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (closes Bug#256969)
+ * Sponsored upload by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (closes: Bug#256969)
Damn parsers.
--=20
Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them!
=20
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : proud Debian developer, admin, and user
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
=20
Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
--UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFA8S6JIgvIgzMMSnURArT/AKDaD1Z2pcJHpbc4sRWFS5D7i6b0lwCcCNpJ
6HGS7BzCMJ+1T6Dax4Wgg0o=
=7gm1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2--
