Your message dated Sat, 08 May 2004 19:17:09 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#135132: fixed in gnotepad+ 1.3.3-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Feb 2002 03:01:04 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 21 21:01:04 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (eeyore.lewismoss.net) [4.18.171.42] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 16e5xI-0000I6-00; Thu, 21 Feb 2002 21:01:04 -0600
Received: from dres by eeyore.lewismoss.net with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
        id 16e5xD-00046l-00; Thu, 21 Feb 2002 22:00:59 -0500
From: James LewisMoss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RFA: gnotepad+ -- GNOME-based Notepad editor
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.43
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.43
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 22:00:59 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: James LewisMoss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-02-21
Severity: normal

Not a complex package.  Hasn't been updated upstream in a while now.

I request an adopter for the gnotepad+ package.
The package description is:
 This is an easy-to-use, yet fairly feature-rich, simple text editor
 for Unix based systems running X11 and using GNOME (the GNU Network
 Object Model Environment).  Gnotepad+ was designed to have as little
 bloat as possible, while still providing many of the common features
 found in a modern GUI-based text editor.  It is still fairly
 light-weight, especially for the features it offers, and aims to
 remain that way.
 .
 The "+" in gnotepad+ is there to differentiate it from other
 GNOME-based text editors which may call themselves "gnotepad".
 Additionally, gnotepad+ is not intended to be fancy, so it leverages
 its text editing capabilities on the GTK Text Widget.  Hence, if you
 are looking for a programmer's editor, look for another text editor
 or help improve the GTK Text Widget.

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux eeyore 2.4.17-rc1 #2 Sun Dec 16 17:50:34 EST 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 135132-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 May 2004 23:23:10 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 08 16:23:10 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1BMb9x-0001w3-00; Sat, 08 May 2004 16:23:10 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1BMb49-000793-00; Sat, 08 May 2004 19:17:09 -0400
From: Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.49 $
Subject: Bug#135132: fixed in gnotepad+ 1.3.3-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 08 May 2004 19:17:09 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Source: gnotepad+
Source-Version: 1.3.3-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gnotepad+, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

gnotepad+_1.3.3-5.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gnotepad+/gnotepad+_1.3.3-5.diff.gz
gnotepad+_1.3.3-5.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gnotepad+/gnotepad+_1.3.3-5.dsc
gnotepad+_1.3.3-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gnotepad+/gnotepad+_1.3.3-5_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated gnotepad+ package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 18:58:39 +0100
Source: gnotepad+
Binary: gnotepad+
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.3.3-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 gnotepad+  - Graphical text and HTML editor
Closes: 135132 146881 161927
Changes: 
 gnotepad+ (1.3.3-5) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Better description, courtesy of Filip Van Raemdonck
   * Don't include menu entries referring to gtkhtml
 .
 gnotepad+ (1.3.3-4) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New maintainer (closes: #135132)
   * Cooperate with new gnotepad+-help package. Conflict with old ones.
   * Restarted packaging from scratch, but taking a lot of stuff
     from the previous package.
   * Bump up Standards-Version to 3.5.8
   * Switch to debhelper V4
   * Don't ship .spec file (closes: #146881)
   * Provide a /usr/bin/gnotepad+ symlink (closes: #161927)
Files: 
 ca4da49f95e62e6d8a210f6f07a820a0 664 editors optional gnotepad+_1.3.3-5.dsc
 e2d3ab9a317af86d43e37b0da1119ef1 115788 editors optional 
gnotepad+_1.3.3-5.diff.gz
 bcc656ac9b01688339250e9bc00de161 186566 editors optional 
gnotepad+_1.3.3-5_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAnWdnQbn06FtxPfARAihpAJoCsWLFnRUqtnhbUGtDUcbGnHCZGACfahUU
x+IsSqqI7/3hrpkfrl4mEHE=
=8NOc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to