Your message dated Wed, 21 Apr 2004 16:03:19 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#245089: debian packaging not available for ypserv
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Apr 2004 12:05:43 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 21 05:05:43 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from deet.btinternet.com [194.73.73.29]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGGU2-0005zH-00; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 05:05:43 -0700
Received: from [81.130.95.59] (helo=lkcl.net)
by deet.btinternet.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #25)
id 1BGGU0-0003b8-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 13:05:40 +0100
Received: from highfield ([192.168.0.223]:58590 helo=lkcl.net)
by lkcl.net with esmtp (Exim 4.24 #1)
id 1BGGWJ-00067F-4a
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 12:08:03 +0000
Received: from root by lkcl.net with local (Exim 4.24)
id 1BGGRo-0004li-GN; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 12:03:24 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: debian packaging not available for ypserv
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.39
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 12:03:24 +0000
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1
Package: ypserv
Severity: wishlist
ypserv is available from http://www.linux-nis.org/nis/ and i've
been looking for it for ages.
i'm incredibly surprised it hasn't been made available as a debian
package yet.
l.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux highfield 2.4.23-1-686 #1 Sun Nov 30 20:51:10 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 245089-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Apr 2004 15:03:39 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 21 08:03:39 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGJGF-0006R2-00; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 08:03:39 -0700
Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10)
id B01A664D4F; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 15:03:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 4177C10864; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 16:03:19 +0100 (BST)
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 16:03:19 +0100
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#245089: debian packaging not available for ypserv
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1
* Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-21 14:48]:
> martin, you are absolutely right.
>
> a search for nis (apt-cache search nis) shows so _many_ packages that
> i totally missed this one - for years :)
In this case I'm closing this bug.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
