Your message dated Thu, 1 Apr 2004 15:25:45 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line already adopted
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Nov 2003 17:25:33 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 09 11:25:33 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1AItJc-00010q-00; Sun, 09 Nov 2003 11:25:33 -0600
Received: from swan by gluck.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1AItJc-00048i-00; Sun, 09 Nov 2003 10:25:32 -0700
From: Stefan Schwandter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: O: snd -- Sound file editor
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2003 10:25:32 -0700
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Stefan Schwandter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0
        tests=HAS_PACKAGE
        version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_9
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_9 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2003-11-09
Severity: normal



-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux gluck 2.4.22-rc2 #1 SMP Mon Aug 18 08:28:49 PDT 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 219837-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Apr 2004 14:26:15 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 01 06:26:15 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1B9395-0006aA-00; Thu, 01 Apr 2004 06:26:15 -0800
Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10)
        id A594B64D50; Thu,  1 Apr 2004 14:26:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 3C3FF10358; Thu,  1 Apr 2004 15:25:45 +0100 (BST)
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 15:25:45 +0100
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: already adopted
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

snd (7.0-1) unstable; urgency=low

  * New upstream release
  * debian/control: I set myself as the new maintainer, as
    Stefan Schwandter does not maintain snd anymore
  * debian/rules: enabled JACK support (set the --with-jack flag)

 -- Free Ekanayaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Fri, 12 Dec 2003 09:00:34 +0600


Gar, please close the WNPP bug next time!

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to