On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 10:11:52AM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 10:31:03PM -0800, Tom wrote: > > Package: wnpp > > Severity: wishlist > > > > * Package name : pim > > Description : Generic record-based data entry for personal databases > > > > Hierarchical personal data manager. Schemas and data are stored in XML. > > Uses GTK2. Designed for single users, small, personal databases. > > Surely it's a too generic name nevertheless?
Yeah, but I can't think of a better name, short of sticking my initials on the end, which is what I did at sourceforge (although the "pim" project is old and never released files.) I can't think of a pragmatic approach. My current inclination is to name the package "pim-tb" and still have the binary just be called "pim", and it could conflict with any future package with also provides /usr/bin/pim. Alternately, I could name the binary "/usr/bin/pim_tb", or just try to come up with completely different unique name. What's the most pragmatic thing to do?
