* Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-17 11:42]: > Alternatively, we can just remove xirssi.
Quite possibly the best choice. It was never part of woody and seems broken (and the description says "development version"). (Note: JD is the maintainer of irssi-text) 14:39 < tbm> JD: hey, should xirssi be removed? 14:40 < JD> tbm: quite possibly 14:40 < tbm> JD: pros/cons? 14:40 < JD> let me do a quite build and see if it is still shagged 14:40 < tbm> JD: ok 14:40 < tbm> JD: if not, will you adopt it? 14:40 < JD> tbm: yes 14:41 < tbm> JD: hmm, it was not art of woody, so I lean towards removal. 14:41 * Kinnison votes for removal 14:41 < Kinnison> it's ugly and regularly broken 14:41 * edd too 14:42 < JD> tbm: wait 2 days. if I haven;t uploaded by then, remove it -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
