Your message dated Tue, 16 Mar 2004 21:32:03 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#210439: fixed in dhelp 0.5.16
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Sep 2003 14:20:29 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 11 09:20:28 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from lmr1.uibk.ac.at (smtp.uibk.ac.at) [138.232.1.142] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 19xSJ9-0001AZ-00; Thu, 11 Sep 2003 09:20:27 -0500
Received: from pc027-c703.uibk.ac.at ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [138.232.65.8])
        by smtp.uibk.ac.at (8.12.9/8.12.9/F1) with ESMTP id h8BEKQgF011600;
        Thu, 11 Sep 2003 16:20:26 +0200
Received: from dkg by pc027-c703.uibk.ac.at with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
        id 19xSJ7-0000cJ-00; Thu, 11 Sep 2003 16:20:25 +0200
From: "Daniel K. Gebhart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RFA: dhelp
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 16:20:25 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-Score: -3 () RCV_UIBK
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.35 at uibk.ac.at
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
        tests=BAYES_30,HAS_PACKAGE
        version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2003-09-11
Severity: normal

Due to lack of motivation, I'll not be able to maintain dhelp in the
future. A first attempt to rewrite dhelp in python can be found on
[1]alioth. However, the rewrite is in a state that almost matches the
messiness of the original version.

[1] http://alioth.debian.org/projects/dhelp/

kind regards,
 Daniel
-- 
Daniel K. Gebhart            http://informatik.uibk.ac.at/users/c703263/
Institute for Computer Science                   University of Innsbruck
Fon: (office): +43 512 507 6093     Mail: <Daniel.Gebhart(at)uibk.ac.at>


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 210439-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Mar 2004 02:38:03 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 16 18:38:03 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1B3QwV-0001kC-00; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 18:38:03 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1B3Qqh-00083Z-00; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 21:32:03 -0500
From: Stefan Hornburg (Racke) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.45 $
Subject: Bug#210439: fixed in dhelp 0.5.16
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 21:32:03 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: dhelp
Source-Version: 0.5.16

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
dhelp, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

dhelp_0.5.16.dsc
  to pool/main/d/dhelp/dhelp_0.5.16.dsc
dhelp_0.5.16.tar.gz
  to pool/main/d/dhelp/dhelp_0.5.16.tar.gz
dhelp_0.5.16_i386.deb
  to pool/main/d/dhelp/dhelp_0.5.16_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Stefan Hornburg (Racke) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated dhelp package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 02:32:11 +0100
Source: dhelp
Binary: dhelp
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.5.16
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stefan Hornburg (Racke) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Stefan Hornburg (Racke) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 dhelp      - online help system
Closes: 202213 203082 207793 210439 210657 230351
Changes: 
 dhelp (0.5.16) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Changed maintainer back to Stefan Hornburg (Racke) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
     (Closes: #210439)
   * Acknowledge bugs closed in NMUs
     (Closes: #203082, #207793, #210657, #230351)
   * Proper handling of creation and deletion of /var/lib/dhelp also fixes
     another bug (Closes: #202213)
Files: 
 d39089c8094b1fed27f43c0a6cca01bb 510 doc optional dhelp_0.5.16.dsc
 9be9b0ece1ff532be98b38898c877781 84249 doc optional dhelp_0.5.16.tar.gz
 8047f1ed2bbc78f7ed4e9d108364ec65 39624 doc optional dhelp_0.5.16_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAV7bLjgVfE5tya3ERAjS1AJ92Cp8QKTir90KbLzWD9NMRJUAczQCfZp3W
rueVOojB5eZQdcRCFCofy/U=
=4PY5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to