Your message dated Thu, 4 Mar 2004 13:08:33 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line cleanup
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Nov 2001 21:06:36 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 27 15:06:36 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from joergland.wohnheim.uni-ulm.de [134.60.220.110] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 168pR6-0001rG-00; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 15:06:36 -0600
Received: from joerg by joergland.wohnheim.uni-ulm.de with local (Exim 3.32 #1
(Debian))
id 168pR1-0001DT-00; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 22:06:31 +0100
From: Joerg Wendland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ITP: rhino -- application framework for configuring, managing and
monitoring hard- and software
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.36
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.36
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 22:06:31 +0100
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Joerg Wendland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2001-11-27
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : rhino
Version : 1.3.7
Upstream Author : Silicon Graphics, Inc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://oss.sgi.com/projects/rhino/index.html
* License : GPL, LGPL
Description : application framework for configuring, managing and
monitoring hard- and software
>From SGI's Website:
Rhino is an infrastructure for building applications that configure, manage,
and monitor hardware and software. Rhino provides a common, consistent,
task-based, internationalized graphical user interface (GUI), with built-in
command-line interfaces (CLIs) that system administrators can use to write
scripts. Rhino applications consist of two parts:
* Client-side GUI in Java. The GUI runs on any platform that has a
Java virtual machine, and it doesn't run as root or do setuid root.
It can enable the user to perform a single task; it can provide an
organized collection of tasks (with a built-in search mechanism);
and it can include GUIs for monitoring the system.
* Server-side daemon and command-line interfaces. These can be written
in C++ so Java doesn't have to run on the server being administered.
I need it especially for SGI's Linux Failsafe.
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux joergland 2.4.16-pre1-kpkg.1 #1 Son Nov 25 21:34:49 CET 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=english, LC_CTYPE=de_DE
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 121458-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Mar 2004 12:08:35 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 04 04:08:35 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from slider.rack66.net [212.3.252.135] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AyreV-0007al-00; Thu, 04 Mar 2004 04:08:35 -0800
Received: by slider.rack66.net (Postfix, from userid 1026)
id D5918F364; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 13:08:33 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 13:08:33 +0100
From: Filip Van Raemdonck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: cleanup
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_01
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_01
X-Spam-Level:
retitle 144980 RFP: sgi-sysadm-base -- infrastructure for system administration
thanks
#121458 is a dupe for (actually the other way around) #144980; since the
former does not contain any info which isn't in the latter, and it's
reporter has expressed not to go ahead with the ITP I'm closing it.
#144980 had already tried to been retitled to RFP.
Also, #144980 should probably be closed within some time. Neither of two
ITPs really got anywhere; and the software appears to be firmly dead
upstream.
Regards,
Filip
--
<Myth> the UNIX trademark has changed hands so much no one is quite sure who
really owns it anymore
