-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I just switched from AFBackup (which was _WAY_ to slow) to Bacula (which is _WAY_ faster :) on two hosts (first a client of mine, and when that worked so fine, I switched myself :).
Being a Debian GNU/Linux developer, I always try to use a .deb package... There was an ITP (#188946), but that was old. Talking to Patrick Cole, I discovered that 'someone else' (the upstream author?) have been applying for DD status to upload Bacula... I have already prepared some Debian GNU/Linux packages which conforms to the Debian GNU/Linux packaging standards (which the upstream - i.e. yours - does not). These packages are built for 'sid' (unstable), so be carefull about installing them on woody (current stable) or sarge (testing)... ftp://ftp.bayour.com/pub/debian/dists/local/binary-all/Bacula/bacula-doc_1.32f.4-1_all.deb ftp://ftp.bayour.com/pub/debian/dists/local/binary-i386/Bacula/*.deb ftp://ftp.bayour.com/pub/debian/dists/local/source/Bacula/* These packages have not been split like the upstream .deb's. I was intending to hi-jack the ITP if that's ok (it seemed to be ok for Patrick). Any objections from this list? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.6 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/> iD8DBQFAQFmnmlWzPKccHgARAirSAJ4wAAoLwQ4CkC6+fI/vz9xxcmxAnQCfb2rd yIJ6rFas6ZvD5ifikHobgLo= =eOa6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
