On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 04:37:24PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 08:40:50AM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> > Upstream Author : Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <snip>
> > Camlp4 syntax extension to get more {easy,perlish} usage of Hashtbl
> > module hash tables.
>
> Erm, since I'm upstream author of this I would rather prefer to package
> it by myself :-) I've never did it since I've no idea of how many people
> use this package.
>
> Moreover is really a tiny package (just one camlp4 .ml), do you think
> it's worth the effort to package it as a standalone package? Wouldn't it
> be better to add is as a debian add-on to the ocaml package or to the
> ocaml-tools package? I've no strong preference here ....
Let's put it in ocaml-tools for now. I don't like the idea of adding it
to the ocaml package, which is mostly a pure upstream ocaml + assorted
bugfixes.
Later, if more camlp4 syntaxe stuff is added, we could have a camlp4-tools
or something such package though.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
